{"id":153,"date":"2019-04-20T22:26:40","date_gmt":"2019-04-20T22:26:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mediamalpractice.net\/?page_id=153"},"modified":"2019-05-08T03:57:03","modified_gmt":"2019-05-08T03:57:03","slug":"mueller-report","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/mediamalpractice.net\/?page_id=153","title":{"rendered":"MUELLER INVESTIGATION"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n\n
2016_Cert_FISC_Memo_Opin_Order_Apr_2017<\/a>Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n

https:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/uscode\/text\/18\/1510<\/a><\/p>\n

18 U.S. Code \u00a7\u202f1510. Obstruction of criminal investigations<\/p>\n

(e) Whoever, having been notified of the applicable disclosure prohibitions or confidentiality requirements of section 2709(c)(1) of this title, section 626(d)(1) or 627(c)(1) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681u(d)(1) or 1681v(c)(1)), section 1114(a)(3)(A) or 1114(a)(5)(D)(i) of the Right to Financial Privacy Act\u202f[1] (12 U.S.C. 3414(a)(3)(A) or 3414(a)(5)(D)(i)), or section 802(b)(1) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 436(b)(1)),[2] knowingly and with the intent to obstruct an investigation or judicial proceeding violates such prohibitions or requirements applicable by law to such person shall be imprisoned for not more than five years, fined under this title, or both.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n\n\n\n

18 U.S. Code \u00a7\u202f1510. Obstruction of criminal investigations
https:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/uscode\/text\/18\/1510
Whoever,having been notified of applicable disclosure prohibitions knowingly and with intent to obstruct an investigation violates such prohibitions,such person shall be imprisoned for not more than five years,fined under this title,or both<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mueller Investigation:
– $35 million (#TaxpayerDollars)
– 13 #AngryDemocratLawyers
– 0 (zero) #RussianCollusion<\/p>\n

@POTUS @realDonaldTrump was #FalselyAccused
https:\/\/townhall.com\/tipsheet\/katiepavlich\/2019\/05\/01\/barr-president-trump-was-falsely-accused-of-something-he-didnt-do-n2545689<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

https:\/\/www.newsweek.com\/how-much-robert-mueller-investigation-cost-report-1372575<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

newsweek.com-How Much Did Robert Muellers Investigation Cost Report Cost Millions but Not As Much As Trump Has Cla<\/a>Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n

https:\/\/www.nbcnews.com\/politics\/donald-trump\/meet-mueller-s-team-best-prosecutors-business-or-angry-democrats-n976226<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meet Mueller’s team_ The best prosecutors in the business or ‘angry Democrats’_<\/a>Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n

https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/news\/post-politics\/wp\/2018\/03\/18\/trump-said-muellers-team-has-13-hardened-democrats-here-are-the-facts\/<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

washingtonpost.com-Trump said Muellers team has 13 hardened Democrats Here are the facts<\/a>Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n

https:\/\/assets.documentcloud.org\/documents\/5986068\/WHSC-to-AG-4-19-19.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

https:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/daily\/2019\/05\/03\/obama-spied-on-trump-and-now-everyone-knows-it\/<\/a><\/p>\n

Emmet Flood, Trump\u2019s lawyer, has sent a four-page letter to William Barr<\/a>, and I think it means that they are on the warpath now.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
WHSC_FLOOD-to-AG_BARR-4-19-19<\/a>Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n

19_0429 ROSENSTEIN RESIGNATION LETTER<\/p>\n

https:\/\/assets.documentcloud.org\/documents\/5982854\/Deputy-AG-Rod-Rosenstein-s-resignation-letter.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Deputy-AG-Rod-Rosenstein-s-resignation-letter<\/a>Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n

SUMMARY – 4 PAGES (https:\/\/judiciary.house.gov\/sites\/democrats.judiciary.house.gov\/files\/documents\/AG%20March%2024%202019%20Letter%20to%20House%20and%20Senate%20Judiciary%20Committees.pdf<\/a>)<\/p>\n

AG Barr March 24 2019 Letter to House and Senate Judiciary Committees<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n


ENTIRE REPORT (https:\/\/www.justice.gov\/storage\/report.pdf<\/a>)<\/p>\n

justice_gov_mueller_report<\/a>

<\/p>\n

ROD ROSENSTEIN LETTER APPOINTING SPECIAL COUNSEL
(https:\/\/assets.documentcloud.org\/documents\/3726381\/Robert-Mueller-Special-Counsel-Russia.pdf<\/a> )<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robert-Mueller-Special-Counsel-Russia<\/a>Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n
August 2nd, 2017 DOJ Letter From Rod Rosenstein To Special Counsel Mueller Outlining Investigative Authorization\u2026 \u2013 Investment Watch<\/a>Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n


STEELE DOSSIER<\/p>\n

(https:\/\/cryptome.org\/2017\/01\/Steele-Trump.pdf)<\/a><\/p>\n

Steele-Trump<\/a><\/p>\n

(https:\/\/assets.documentcloud.org\/documents\/3259984\/Trump-Intelligence-Allegations.pdf<\/a>)<\/p>\n

Trump-Intelligence-Allegations<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

HILLARY WRITES OP-ED IN WASHINGTON POST<\/p>\n

(Hillary Clinton Op-ed on Mueller Report)<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"\/<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
Hillary Clinton – Mueller report Op-ed<\/a>Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n

 <\/p>\n

Sally Yates needs to be prosecuted as well for approving the bogus FISA on Carter Page https:\/\/<\/span>int.nyt.com\/data\/documenth<\/span>elper\/95-carter-page-fisa-documents-foia-release\/full\/optimized.pdf<\/span> <\/span>\u2026<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

CNN — they seem to have pretty good evidence right here that the Trump Campaign was spied upon. http:\/\/<\/span>dailycaller.com\/2018\/05\/18\/cla<\/span>pper-fbi-spying-trump-campaign\/<\/span> <\/span>\u2026<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The NYT headlined in 2017 that the Trump campaign was spied upon “wiretapped” — seems like plenty of evidence #<\/s>MediaMalpractice<\/b><\/a> https:\/\/<\/span>nypost.com\/2017\/03\/08\/did<\/span>-the-new-york-times-already-tell-us-trump-was-wiretapped\/<\/span> <\/span>\u2026<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

https:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/uscode\/text\/18\/1510 18 U.S. Code \u00a7\u202f1510. Obstruction of criminal investigations (e) Whoever, having been notified of the applicable disclosure prohibitions or confidentiality requirements of section 2709(c)(1) of this title, section 626(d)(1) or 627(c)(1) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681u(d)(1) or 1681v(c)(1)), section 1114(a)(3)(A) or 1114(a)(5)(D)(i) of the Right<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":39,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"categories":[],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mediamalpractice.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/153"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mediamalpractice.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mediamalpractice.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mediamalpractice.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mediamalpractice.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=153"}],"version-history":[{"count":33,"href":"https:\/\/mediamalpractice.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/153\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1242,"href":"https:\/\/mediamalpractice.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/153\/revisions\/1242"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mediamalpractice.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/39"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mediamalpractice.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=153"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mediamalpractice.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=153"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mediamalpractice.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=153"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}